Thursday, September 17, 2009

Diffusion Theory

Taken from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwitr/docs/diffusion/index.html

Surry, D. W. (1997). Diffusion Theory and Instructional Technology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT). from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwitr/docs/diffusion/index.html

Diffusion is defined as the process by which an innovation is adopted and gains acceptance by members of a certain community. A number of factors interact to influence the diffusion of an innovation. The four major factors that influence the diffusion process are
  • the innovation itself,
  • how information about the innovation is communicated,
  • time, and
  • the nature of the social system into which the innovation is being introduced (Rogers, 1995).
The Innovation Decision Process theory (Rogers, 1995) states that diffusion is a process that occurs over time and can be seen as having five distinct stages. The stages in the process are
  • Knowledge,
  • Persuasion,
  • Decision,
  • Implementation, and
  • Confirmation.
According to this theory, potential adopters of an innovation must learn about the innovation, be persuaded as to the merits of the innovation, decide to adopt, implement the innovation, and confirm (reaffirm or reject) the decision to adopt the innovaàion.


Applications of diffusion theory to instructional technology can be grouped into two major, categories with distinctly separate goals.
  1. The first major category focuses on the reform and restructuring of educational institutions. The goal of this category of IT diffusion research is to develop theories of organizational change, most commonly school change, in which technology plays a major role
  2. The second major category of IT diffusion research focuses on increasing the adoption and utilization of specific instructional products. The goal of this category of research is to develop theories of technology adoption that will lead to a more widespread use of instructional innovations.

Adopter Based (Instrumentalist) Theory

Adopter based theories focus on the human and interpersonal aspects of innovation diffusion. Adopter based theories are inherently instrumental in philosophy because they view the end user -- the individual who will ultimately implement the innovation in a practical setting, as the primary force for change. These theories reject the assumption that superior products and practices will automatically be attractive to potential adopters.

    Burkman's User Oriented Instructional Development process consists of 5 steps:
  1. Identify the potential adopter
  2. Measure relevant potential adopter perceptions
  3. Design and develop a user-friendly product
  4. Inform the potential adopter (of the product's user-friendliness)
  5. Provide Post Adoption Support

Developer Based (Determinist) Theory

The goal of developer based theory is to increase diffusion by maximizing the efficiency, effectiveness and elegance of an innovation. The developer, or architect, of superior technology is seen as the primary force for change. The underlying assumption of developer based theories is deterministic in its belief that superior technological products and systems will, by virtue of their superiority alone, replace inferior products and systems. Developer based theories of diffusion see change as following dàirectly from a technological revolution.

Conclusion
In order to maximize the potential benefit of diffusion theory, instructional technologists should adopt a more instrumentalist philosophy of technology. No reasonable diffusion theorist would suggest that technological superiority is the only necessary condition for diffusion. Instructional technologists have been seduced by the simplicity and basic logic of technological determinism.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

My field notes

Salmon 5-stage moderation model --- I spent the most time in stage 1 of the 5-stage moderation model. The 1st stage involves access and motivation. (offer assurance, welcome and motivation to stay and participate in the course. This stage ends when participants post their first messages)

How do I make teachers sign up to the website?
  • set up the platform for teachers to interact in the online forum
  • provide trainings
  • make personal approaches (f2f and telephone)
  • send personal emails (welcome them and provide links)
  • send sms
  • post invitation through facebook
  • conduct promotion during SELEC 2009
  • provide lucrative reward

Stage 2: online socialization - familiarising and providing bridges between cultural, social and learning environments - (encourage group discussion and make room for purely social interaction among participants & maintain good atmosphere for discussion)
  • post topics for discussion
  • respond positively to the responses post by the participants
  • let participants introduce themselves through the forum.

Stage 3: Information Exchange - facilitating tasks and supporting use of learning materials (participants actively exchange information based on the course content / information/issues presented by the moderator; provide stimulation and guidance in constructive use of learning materials and effective information sharing)
  • upgrade website to make it resourceful.
  • announce website updates and provide website links through facebook
  • post announcement and provide links through personal emails
Stage 4: Knowledge construction - Facilitating process - (participants share personal knowledge and opinions. Moderator facilitate, stimulate, summarize and weave together course discussions.
  • respond to forum by asking questions for further discussions
  • summarize responses
Stage 5: Development - supporting and responding. (participants use personal experience to drive their own exploration of the topic area being studied & reflect on their own learning process. Moderator support and respond to participants as they define and lead their own discussions.
  • support participants' ideas

Recommendations for further research

1. measuring the success of online forum
2. analysis of key factors for the success of online forum
3. study the use of online forum among resource / master teachers
4. study the effective moderation of online forum

Surat pekeliling LADAP

surat pekeliling ladap....

Standard Guru Malaysia

Standard Guru Malaysia

Saturday, September 5, 2009

Consent feedback from Rajess

"I have read and understood the ...‏
From: rajess rengasamy (rajess.rengasamy@gmail.com)
Sent: Saturday, 5 Sep, 2009 8: 38 AM
To: nurulhana2000@hotmail.com

"I have read and understood the information above and I am giving you my consent to become the participant of the research mentioned above.'


This email is a copy of a message sent to you at "CoP"

Friday, September 4, 2009

Foo's outline of chapter 4 and 5

Chapter 4- Data presentation and discussion
4.1 methodology summary
4.2 Results from data analysis
4.2.1 RQ1
Documentary
commentary
catharsis
metacognition
information
evaluation
community

4.2.2 RQ2
4.2.2.1 Levels of reflection in the weblogs
4.2.2.2 Factors that influence the levels of reflection in the weblogs
perception of reflection
attitude to weblogging
peer support
instruction and instructor role
audience
time
assessment

Chapter 5 - Discussion, Implications and recommendations
5.1 Summary and discussion of results
5.1.1 RQ1
5.1.2 RQ2

5.2 Implications
5.2.1 Theoretical implications
5.2.2 Practical implications

5.3 Recommendations for further research
5.4 Concluding remarks

Bibliography

Appendices

Foo's appendix

a. letter of approval for research topic
b. interview protocol
c. transcript of audio tape interview
d. examples of participants' weblogs
e. example of weblogs content analysis
f. participant consent form
g. instructional design model -ADDIE
h. matching familiar figures test

Interview protocol

RQ1:

1. What driven you to participate in the online forum?
A. your rapport with the moderator
B. you believe in life long learning and want to improve yourself
C. the reward offered ( Noritake tea set)
D. the persistent emails you received from the moderator
E. other reasons

2. Which topic appeal to you most and why?
3. Which topic does not appeal to you most and why?
4. What stop you from responding to a topic after viewing it?
5. Do you consider reflecting on your own thinking a difficult task? why?
6. Does by participating in the forum help to enhance your personal and professional development?
7. Should online forum be proposed to replace LADAP? why or why not?


Protocol

1. establish rapport
2. explain format of interview. Accept divergent views
3 Prompt for more unanticipated answers using open-ended questions
4. Issues / constructs outlined to be addressed flexibly - guided by participants' conversation

Strategy to boost motivation - email 20

Dear all,

A new topic for discussion has been posted. Feel free to respond to the topic at http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=38

Engaging ourselves in an intellectual discourse will help us to enhance our personal and professional development.

See you there!

Consent form

Dearest friends,

Thank you for your willingness to be the participants of my research "The use of online forum for personal development by English language teachers".

I would appreciate it so much if you could verify your consent to be my research participant by going to the link and reply to the forum post http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=16#p31

Thank you for your time and cooperation.

Sincerely from
Hana.

Strategy to boost motivation - email 19

Dear all,

Since I need to collect more data for my research I have posted another topic for us to discuss. Please use this link
http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=37 to respond to the topic.

In case you have not noticed, I have posted an earlier topic at this link http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=36 for us to share our opinion. You could also ask questions if you need some clarification on the topics being discussed. I hope we could learn from each other by interacting asynchronously through the forum.

Hope to see you online soon. Thank you for your participation.


Regards from,
Hana

Announcing the most active participant

Dear all,
As promised, the Noritake tea set has a new owner now and ready to be claimed. Up to 31 August 2009, Sara has posted 10 responses to the online forum and has initiated 2 topics for discussion. Hence making her the most active online forum participant. Congratulations Sara!

I sincerely hope every one will continue to interact and share thoughts and ideas in teaching and learning through the online forum. Click http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/view.php?id=104 to view the topics for discussion and click on the title to view the discussion thread and reply to the forum. So far, nobody had responded to the topic on project-based learning http://www.nurulhana.com/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=36. I wonder whether any one of you have tried implementing project-based learning in class or probably it is your first time being introduced to it.

Thank you for the support I get from every body.

Sincerely yours,
Hana